Forum
« light-weight distros »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
May 19, 2013, 4:55am



Return to or visit the SalineOS webpage

Forum :: General :: Off Topic :: light-weight distros
   [Search This Thread] [Share Topic] [Print]
 AuthorTopic: light-weight distros (Read 803 times)
malspa
Full Member
***
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 171
Location: albuquerque
 light-weight distros
« Thread Started on Sept 13, 2011, 10:17am »

Had to mention SalineOS in the "Which Lightweight Distro do you prefer and why?" thread at the Ubuntu forums: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1842053

I didn't see any other comments about Saline there, though.

Actually, if I was trying to put Linux on a really old computer, I might go with something else; it depends.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
Anthony Nordquist
Administrator
*****
member is offline




[homepage]

Joined: Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,336
 Re: light-weight distros
« Reply #1 on Sept 13, 2011, 11:10pm »


Sept 13, 2011, 10:17am, malspa wrote:
Had to mention SalineOS in the "Which Lightweight Distro do you prefer and why?" thread at the Ubuntu forums: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1842053

I didn't see any other comments about Saline there, though.

Actually, if I was trying to put Linux on a really old computer, I might go with something else; it depends.


For machines with less than 512 megabytes of RAM, it really is best to go with a LXDE or OpenBox based distro. You forgo the niceities that Xfce brings, but you do get a faster system. OpenBox is especially good at not getting in the way, just a bit bare bones for some.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
beardedragon
Global Moderator
*****
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Feb 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 857
 Re: light-weight distros
« Reply #2 on Sept 16, 2011, 12:46pm »


Sept 13, 2011, 10:17am, malspa wrote:
Had to mention SalineOS in the "Which Lightweight Distro do you prefer and why?" thread at the Ubuntu forums: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1842053

I didn't see any other comments about Saline there, though.

Actually, if I was trying to put Linux on a really old computer, I might go with something else; it depends.

I had a look at the new ArchBang, it's Openbox and very light. See it here: http://archbang.org/
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Robert Collard, Madison, WI
HP s5710f, 2x AMD Athlon II 260@3.2Ghz 3GB RAM, 640GB HD
Debian 7.0 XFCE-4.10 3.2.0-4-amd64

If you are satisfied with the results, please Edit your first post and add [Solved] to the Subject line.
Richard
Elder Member
*****
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Jan 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 586
Location: Venezuela
 Re: light-weight distros
« Reply #3 on Sept 16, 2011, 4:21pm »

Crunchbang has an Openbox version and is based on Squeeze, as is SalineOS.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

SalineOS-1.7, Xfce4.6.2, w/ 3.2.0-0.bpo.4-686-pae;
SalineOS-2.0, Xfce4.8, w/ 3.2.0-4-686-pae
Fedora-18, Xfce4.10, w/ 3.8.x
bohu
New Member
*
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Jan 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 18
Location: near Branson, Missouri, USA
 Re: light-weight distros
« Reply #4 on Sept 18, 2011, 12:14am »

I too have been thinking about this again lately. An elderly woman (in her 70s) sent her computer home with me to install linux on it. I was shocked that she even knows what it is. Win98 has always been flaky and she hates it. The computer isn't powerful enough to upgrade to a newer windows and she wouldn't spend the money anyway. She only uses her computer to play card games when there is nothing on TV. She doesn't even have internet and doesn't want it.

6 GB hard drive. 586 series 500MHz processor. 128MB of sd100 ram. I added a 64MB stick that I had which brings the total to 196MB.

So which distro to install? All she needs is a taskbar and a menu and lots of card games. No internet. No office apps. I tried Debian net-install but it wouldn't even boot. Saline won't boot because the machine only has a CD-ROM (no DVD). LegacyOS (formerly TeenPup) installed but only has a few games and nothing in the repository.

I tried Zenwalk, Salix, and Wolvix. None of them will even boot.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

NRA certified pistol instructor, bookworm, linux nut, pitbull enthusiast
gnuuser
New Member
*
member is offline





Joined: Sept 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 7
 Re: light-weight distros
« Reply #5 on Sept 18, 2011, 7:21am »

@ bohu

with a system that old I would install vector version 5
this will run ok on that machine and has lots of games and many more that can be downloaded. ;D
« Last Edit: Sept 18, 2011, 7:26am by gnuuser »Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

too much blood in my caffeine system
registered Linux user number 505431
murdock
Full Member
***
member is offline

[avatar]


[homepage]

Joined: Feb 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 188
Location: Costa Rica
 Re: light-weight distros
« Reply #6 on Sept 18, 2011, 4:45pm »


Sept 18, 2011, 7:21am, gnuuser wrote:
@ bohu

with a system that old I would install vector version 5
this will run ok on that machine and has lots of games and many more that can be downloaded. ;D

I agree. That or find a copy of Xandros.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

No Artificial Ingredients
www.arenalbotanicalgarden.com
Skype : arenalgarden.
wh7qq
Junior Member
**
member is offline





Joined: Apr 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 50
Location: Hawaii
 Re: light-weight distros
« Reply #7 on Oct 1, 2011, 5:47pm »

@ bohu


Quote:
An elderly woman (in her 70s)
. Not that far away for me or wife. We don't think of our world traveler neighbors, both well over 70, as "elderly". When was the last time you walked among the penguins in Antarctica? Maybe when you no longer need "Proactive" you won't be so insensitive.

you might want to try Puppy linux...my ancient compaq presario with a K6-2 433mhz and 192M runs it nicely. I can't speak to the games but lupu is ubuntu based so it should have a pretty good complement in the repos. It does take some patience to set up since no way will the old machine ever be fast, but it loads and runs better than it ever did with '98.

Paul
« Last Edit: Oct 1, 2011, 8:36pm by wh7qq »Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
smithnwesson
New Member
*
member is offline





Joined: Oct 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 19
 Re: light-weight distros
« Reply #8 on Oct 3, 2011, 2:50pm »

CTKArch... It's Arch with an openbox desktop. Can't get more up to date than Arch. Comes as a live cd that is installable. You can install whatever you want from AUR and any Arch updates are tested by CTK before you update your own system. I have another box just like this one I'll be installing it to play with so I can learn Openbox.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
jrocks
New Member
*
member is offline





Joined: Oct 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 2
 Re: light-weight distros
« Reply #9 on Oct 27, 2011, 11:54am »

I have been testing cruxex its a distro based on crux and its a fast little distro there package system is in cli but easy to use if you have used arch it will be a walk in park heres the site http://cruxex.exton.net/ the person makes a few othere respins but more for swedish folk http://linux.exton.net/
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
   [Search This Thread] [Share Topic] [Print]



Anthony Nordquist, on behalf of the SalineOS project, is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com. As such, if you click the above banner and then make any purchase including digital downloads, a small percentage will be paid to the SalineOS project.
Click Here To Make This Board Ad-Free


This Board Hosted For FREE By ProBoards
Get Your Own Free Message Boards & Free Forums!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Notice | FTC Disclosure | Report Abuse | Mobile